Rob Stokes

What is the best performing eMarketing tactic?

by Rob Stokes

2006/10/24

At the recent South African Online Marketing Conference, Richard Mullins, a Director at Acceleration said in his presentation that online media buys (CPM banners, skyscrapers etc.) are the most effective online marketing tactic available. Immediately the SEM and Affiliate folks around the room started looking at each other in amazement. Being my usual outspoken (read tactless!) self I challenged him on this because quite frankly I believed it to be complete bollocks. For example if you run a PPC campaign properly it will THRASH a banner campaign with respect to CPA and total ROI; all a marketer could want would be more volume. It seems Threadwatch agree with me on this one with a recent post questioning if anything comes even close to SEM from an ROI perspective and stating that online media buys don’t even come close.

I’d like to hear what you think the best performing online marketing tactic is. I think the definition of “best performing” should be that it consistently delivers a superior holistic ROI. That gives scope to even include a branding effect if in fact one can actually be proven.

Comments

Ditto. i hope you punished him. There is simply no way you can compare the two. Taking it to an extreme... lets look at the G's results for the 3rd Q 2006 $1626 mill from google.com ( PPC, Adwords) and then $1037 from Network ( Adsense/ Skyscrapers etc) Thats $500 million worth of differance per quarter, so roughly PPC out performs adsense to the tune of 5.5 million per pday in revenue. And given PPC is results based, that should tell you something. Now, please make this damn box bigger. S.mith

Posted by Smith on 2006/10/25

Totally agree, there is no way a properly set up and maintained SEM campaign will be less effective than a comparable "media buy" campaign. The type of traffic a search engine provids has proven to be extremely effective. Just one look at any of the hitwise stats proves this. Take Mr Mullins' comment, and add it with Alex Hogg's comment on search traffic at the Blogger's Indaba, and it looks like we have a worrying mindset in this country. Or are these just isolated incidents?

Posted by Andrew on 2006/10/26

I think we need to be careful how we define “best performing”. What are the client’s objectives and does this match the medium we choose to reach these objectives with? If my client is looking for on-site user interaction with a 3d model of their new car, display seems the logical answer. If the client is looking to drive sales of a particular model of a PC perhaps search is the best answer. I don’t think it is fair to dismiss display. "Most effective" needs to be put in context of client objectives. Interestingly, I have run a campaign for major PC brand through out the year. While Search had a better CPA , across the year Display had a higher order value/sale than Search. Not sure what to make of it yet...

Posted by Raymond on 2006/11/12

Make a comment

To prevent GottaQuirk from becoming spam central, we block the use of certain words like porn, sex etc. We apologise for any inconvenience, but can't spend our lives deleting messages left by spammy friends.

Captcha