Bottom stain Coffee stains
Lyndi Lawson

Some Rights Reserved: Textbook Theft is Not OK

by Lyndi Lawson

2009/02/12

Yesterday afternoon at about 4:30 I was minding my own business, starting to anticipate my snail crawl along the M3 to the sounds of my favourite radio show, The Fresh…The Fresh…The Fresh Drive.
It was just your average Wednesday afternoon. That is, until Dan, our resident BrandsEye genius, sent me an email with a link to a site where the textbook is listed. Not unusual in itself, I’ll admit… until a closer look revealed that they were not merely listing it with a link to the download, but that they were actually selling it!

Yes, you read that right: some sneaky sneaky weasel of a company (and you know I’m using ‘weasel’ because Kat won’t let me swear in blog posts) has been selling the download that we offer for FREE. Oh the horror! Just to clarify our indignation – eMarketing: the essential guide to online marketing is licensed under Creative Commons. This allows for users to reproduce the content and adapt it as they like, provided that they share it with the community as we do, that they attribute it to Quirk and (and this is the important part in this case) that they do not gain from it commercially.

Clearly someone didn’t read the small print:

 

This is cached image of the site, I know it isn’t very pretty (apologies for that, but like a moron, I didn’t take a screenshot of it yesterday). After my to- the-point message, they removed the listing immediately. I did ask them very nicely to get in touch with me, and well… I’m still waiting. Humph.

Before yesterday, I didn’t think that this would ever be an issue. Boy have I learnt something:

  • There are devious ‘weasels’ out there who will steal content and use it to make a profit.
  • Knowing what is yours, who is accessing it and where it is going is important. My advice: monitor your content closely.
  • Know your rights and make sure your work is adequately protected. Creative Commons is a good way to go.

Kat has plans to chat to Paul Jacobson, and possibly some other experts, around the legalities of all this next week. Watch this space for more information.

One thing I can say is, bless BrandsEye and of course, Craig who created it and Dan who spends hours each and every day sorting and rating Quirk mentions.

Update: You can check out the chat with Paul Jacobson here.

Comments

It's never right to steal content, whether it's a textbook, or just a blog post. I found this article from ProBlogger (http://www.problogger.net/archives/2009/02/08/how-to-defend-your-blogs-copyright/) really informative when it comes to regaining control over your intellectual property.

I'm glad you caught the 'weasel' before he made too much money off your hard work!

Posted by Sigrid on 2009/02/12

There you have it. It is not right to make money off public domain material licensed under the Creative Commons. The one application,BrandsEye saved the day and assisted track misuse of your brand, Viva BrandsEye. One the best ORM tools

Posted by Hasanain Abdullah on 2009/02/13

@hasanain - wow - thanks for the kind words! You're completely right, there is just far to much of this sort of this happening online and while we have the tools to monitor and manage it I worry about some of the other private publishers who don't.

Thanks again,

Tim
@timshier

Posted by Tim Shier on 2009/02/13

Glad we all see eye to eye on the issue of making money off free content :)

@Sigrid Thanks for the recommendation - I'll definitely have a look at that article. I'm also looking forward to reading what Paul Jacobson says to Kat next week. He's really clued up on online copyright legality issues.

@hasanain Thanks for the comment! It's always great to hear what other people think of our products. I always knew that BrandsEye was pretty cool but this has opened my eyes to yet another use for it that hadn't occurred to me before.

Posted by Lyndi on 2009/02/13

oh well, the joys of making your content available for free.

Posted by boer on 2009/02/14

@Boer. I'm not sure that the fact that it's free is the issue. It is licensed content whether under traditional copyright or Creative Commons and that is what has been overlooked in it's redistribution. It wouldn't be any different if we were selling it and someone else was reselling it and making a profit, would it?

Posted by Lyndi on 2009/02/19

Make a comment

To prevent GottaQuirk from becoming spam central, we block the use of certain words like porn, sex etc. We apologise for any inconvenience, but can't spend our lives deleting messages left by spammy friends.

Captcha
 
Afrigator