Heidi Schneigansz

When Revamping Your Website, Remember Your Users

by Heidi Schneigansz

2009/06/10

Two well known South African websites have recently undergone face-lifts, one more successfully than the other.

Nando’s, one of my favourite chicken fast-food outlets, have gone the ‘aesthetics first, award-winning’ route. They have a full flash site with a non-standard experiential navigation.

Nando's Home Page

When the craving for Nando’s awesome peri-peri wings hits, I need to satisfy it immediately so I usually turn to Google to help me find the nearest branch. Considering that about 60% of Internet users begin their browsing with a Google search, Search engine friendliness is a fundamentally important part of any company’s online presence.

If you Google ‘Peri-peri chicken’ or ‘Nando’s restaurants’ the top Search Results click through to pages that display a 404 Error (page not found). This means that, potentially, more than half of chicken fans searching for Nando’s online may not find it

Nando's - Our Restaurant

The website itself is good-looking, but unfortunately it seems they did not consider their primary audience: hungry people looking for a place to order chicken. It is very heavy on bandwidth; on a standard 384kbps iBurst line, it took me almost 4 minutes and 4.9Mb to load the site, open the delivery menu and find a branch to order from. By the time I got to the “Our restaurants” page my stomach was rumbling in anticipation of those wings but I struggled to use the restaurant locator, the text on the page is hardly legible and the controls are difficult to use.

Luckily the site can be made friendlier without too much trouble. The 404 errors can be easily remedied with 301 redirects and usability can be improved by introducing HTML navigation, changing the fonts and GUI controls and reducing the file sizes of the downloadable menus. There are a few other things that can be done to optimise the site, but I’m not giving everything away here! ;-)

 News 24

The other face-lift of note was to News24.com, South Africa’s biggest website. With over 1,3 million visitors a month, revamping News24 must have been no mean feat. The team who shed blood, sweat and tears to create the site must be congratulated! It is clean, light and easy to navigate while still looking great. The new News24.com structure is very ‘blog-like’ and uses lots of great Social Media tools like RSS, share buttons and a beefed up ‘MyNews24’ blog section.

News24 thought of their users when they redesigned their site. Elan Lohmann, Head of Social Networking and Communications for Naspers MIH Internet Africa said on his blog that,  “The News24 redesign is not ground-breaking or incredible, it’s not original, it’s not going to win a prize for innovation – but it is profoundly significant in SA online history…".

Call me old-fashioned but when a company has a search-engine friendly, well structured and easy to use site, they make an instant fan out of me. 

Also Check Out:

Comments

Loving the post - great use of current examples while adding basic elements of redesign. Completely agree, the nandos site has no direction just a "flashy" design with poor functionality. I really look forward to seeing more of your posts :)

Posted by sarveshen on 2009/06/10

Nice, uncomplicated but valuable evaluation and comparison of the two sites. Good first post at your new company. Hope to read more!

Posted by NicP on 2009/06/10

Great article, and I agree with the bulk of your points, but I think that you're comparing apples and oranges, and that that a simple call for HTML elements misses the mark.

Both sites serve a radically different purpose, and Nando's site would not work if layed out as a portal either. Their main purpose is, I would guess, branding, and as such, the makers have (badly, in my opinion) attempted to create an immersive and memorable experience.

The bulk of the issues you have highlighted seem to stem from simple, old fashioned shoddy workmanship. The 404 errors could happen just as easily with HTML as flash, and with a well coded flash site, many of the search and file size issues could be avoided.

The Nando's website should not be criticised for being Flash, but rather because it shows just how little time and effort is put into the all important technical aspects of a web site. Too many agencies seem to think that 90% of the work happens in Photoshop, and then that's it.

To be quiet honest, the new News24 site has a large number of technical issues that are no different from the Nando's website.

Some of the navigation is JavaScript based, their are scripts being rendered in the page instead of being linked to from the head, and although they have avoided a table based layout, there is a lot of junk markup, and they use the Jquery, Prototype and Scriptaculous libraries. A massive file overhead.

Posted by Andrew on 2009/06/10

Hi Andrew,

I completely agree with your comments. I feel that, if done with creativity and technical aplomb, flash can take a website from good to great. My issue with the Nando’s site is not the flash (although it is not done as well as it could be) but the loading time, the usability and the large file size of the downloadable menus. As I said – The problems can be easily remedied though.

I was also not comparing the News24 site with the Nando’s site directly. I acknowledge that they have different target audiences and different user journeys. Both sites were revamped in the same week and I was using them to compare good usability with poor usability. Not being a hard-core coder myself, I am not in a position to comment on the technical aspects of the News24 site. To me as an average user, it is a pleasure to use.

Thanks a mil for your comment, it's great to have this kind of thought-provoking feedback! :-)

Heidi

Posted by Heidi on 2009/06/10

Short, sweet and to the point, good post.

I've spent some time on the Nando's and it really is difficult to navigate and read. I wouldn't shed a tear if flash died.

Posted by Shaun Custers on 2009/06/10

Great post, Goosie! I myself like a very 'pretty' site but have come to understand functionality and design go hand in hand. Also if it's flash I can't get onto it via mobile. :)

Posted by SuperSanti on 2009/06/10

Sick post, 'goose.

And it's great to see a seasoned blogger such as yourself grace GottaQuirk. ;)

Posted by Tim W on 2009/06/10

@sarveshen @NicP @Shaun @Santi @FC Aw, thanks guys. I know it has taken me a while to blog here but let's hope that this is the first of many posts on GottaQuirk!

Posted by Heidi on 2009/06/11

Good points, most of us out there are busy and have low attention spans,---speaking for myself if a site takes too long to load, difficult to navigate, or too concept orientated, then l'm off in a flash to a more user friendly site. Take-away sites should be geek free and more hard-sell, eg. menu and ordering instructions with prices should be prominent or else the user will simply refere to his yellow pages and get on the phone, this is the method l use, as l find such websites too fussy and crowded with stuff l don't want to read because,---duh, lm hungry and want a pizza and l want it now!

Posted by colin syme on 2009/06/11

Well, it seems like another blog, but while though i have gone through it, i found it with huge interesting topics and all that. This seems like very informative and i' love to recommend everyone as this blog giving a huge interest to everyone need. I do love this blog and hopefully i would be in touch with it as it becomes my favorite one. lol..Thanks!

Posted by farukh on 2009/09/04

Make a comment

To prevent GottaQuirk from becoming spam central, we block the use of certain words like porn, sex etc. We apologise for any inconvenience, but can't spend our lives deleting messages left by spammy friends.

Captcha