Tim Withers

Google Encrypted Search and What it Means for SEO

by Tim Withers

2011/10/20

 Google secure search SSL

Google makes secure search default for all logged-in users.

Google announced late Tuesday that it has applied an encryption protocol called SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) on all searches originating from users logged into a Google account. As a result, Google Analytics will no longer provide data for keywords driving traffic through organic search (Google AdWords reporting will be unaffected), and these keywords will be listed as “(not provided)”. This has only been rolled out on google.com to date, so should impact on just a small percentage of traffic to your site, but this number can be expected to increase significantly as encryption is implemented across Google’s other domains.

Google says this move reflects the growing need to protect personalised results, and will allow it to further enhance the default search experience for signed-in users. This follows strong pressure from regulators to protect users’ privacy, particularly in Europe where its offerings have been the focus of several enquiries.

There’s much debate to be had about whether this necessitated such a dramatic change, and if the decision to retain AdWords data constitutes a double standard. There’s also the question of what it means for other Analytics packages. As Search Marketers though, more pressing is the discussion around reporting on organic search traffic and the ways in which we can adapt our processes to compensate for the loss of keyword-specific information.

The most obvious answer is to substitute Analytics’ keyword reports with search query data from Google Webmaster Tools, which provides a list of the top 1000 traffic-driving keywords over the past month. This won’t allow us to segment traffic and conversions into brand and non-brand, as we did previously, but it will give us a good view of which terms are working for a site and the areas that require attention.

We’ll also still have all the usual Analytics metrics at our disposal – time on site, pages per visit, bounce rate, etc – and using these in tandem with data extrapolated from Webmaster Tools will provide plenty of insight. Perhaps not quite the same insights as before, but we certainly won’t be in the dark as to what’s working, what’s not, and what needs to be done to achieve our objectives.

Not to say that the drawbacks are insignificant. Most notably, being shorn of keyword data makes it impossible to determine the ROI of a specific term. This also makes it more difficult to identify trends and opportunities, and analyse keyword performance of deeper linked pages. Fortunately, while these are definite challenges, in no way should they stop SEO from delivering excellent results.

There’s a lot of hyperbole flying around at the moment, and as is to be expected, the fear mongers are kicking up a fuss, but this doesn’t represent the “death of SEO”. Not even close. Whether we like it or not, Google Analytics is evolving; now it’s up to us to evolve with it.

About The Author

Comments

Tim, I agree with using Webmaster Tools as the crutch for keyword popularity.

With regards to Google's new encryption application for logged in Google users, I have the following two points (or questions) that I'd like to raise:

1. Not everyone has a Google account, in fact I don't believe that the organic stats that we see in Analytics will be affected in any 'drastic' way. While we may lose out on accurate organic reporting, the affect it will have should be minimal. This of course is dependent on the target niche. If you are running through reports for a steel fabrication company, then logged in Google account holders (visitors) should be a minority. However, if the site is web, SEO or marketing related (such as your blog) then we obviously have a reason for concern.

2. Google Analytics have never been 100% accurate in my opinion. Other software such as Smarterstats have been a lot more accurate. Now my question: Does Google's SSL encryption affect ALL trafic logging software? (excuse my ignorance, I haven't done that much research on this matter yet).

Posted by Juan on 2011/10/20

Wow Tim, as usual thanx to you and everyone at Quirk for this best in class info!
Following hot on the heels of the ssl
facebook security update in october 2011
this certainly keeps everyone busy.

Do I understand correctly this only comes into play if you're logged into your G account and then do a search? If so, will the analytics still be available if someone, not logged in, finds you via search? (In other words will the searcher's info still reflect in Analytics)

Any idea what the effect will be on the myriad of SEO programs that draw from Google keywords/ trends etc? Do we all rush out and subscribe to Wordtracker?

Thanx again for great, meaningful info.
Peter

Posted by Peter on 2011/10/20

Hi Peter

Thanks very much for the comment.

Yup, that's correct. In terms of programs that leverage Google search data; AdWords will be unaffected as it only reports on paid volumes, but we can expect packages that rely on organic queries to be severely hamstrung by this.

Posted by Tim Withers on 2011/10/20

Hey Juan

Thanks for weighing in.

1) I'd agree in terms of local traffic, but I think sites that derive a lot of visits from Europe and the US will see a significant drop in reported keywords. There are over 200 million users of Gmail worldwide, and many of these people browse logged in.

2) I'd agree with that, but it's been a lot more accurate than it's going to be now (at least where keywords are concerned). The consensus is that it will affect all traffic logging software. Google would be shooting themselves in the foot if it didn't, especially considering their drive to monetise GA.

Posted by Tim Withers on 2011/10/20

Make a comment

To prevent GottaQuirk from becoming spam central, we block the use of certain words like porn, sex etc. We apologise for any inconvenience, but can't spend our lives deleting messages left by spammy friends.

Captcha