Keryn Brews

Knowledge Graph: Entities in Search.

by Keryn Brews

2012/05/25

Google is working to understand content and the relationships between things in the way that people do. The search engine giant recently announced the introduction of the Knowledge Graph, a search feature that allows you to search for entities. An entity is something that exists online, although it might not have a material presence, such as distance or a nutritional rating. They are pulled from an array of sources. Effectively this means you can search for your favourite sports teams, mountain ranges, paintings and more, and Google will return, not only the traditional search results, but other information relevant to your search query, drawing from more than simple keyword data. According to Google, the Knowledge Graph contains over 500 million objects, and over 3.5 billion facts about and relationships between these objects.\

But what does this mean for search?

According to Juan Karstel, Engage Strategist at Quirk Cape Town, this could lead to increased emphasis on online brand strategies that are sustainable in the long run and not simply after quick wins and short term results. It also means less focus on manipulative link building techniques.

Tim Withers, Head of SEO at Quirk Cape Town also weighed in on the development.

“The concept of entities in search is an intriguing one; a search for the ‘Eiffel Tower’, for example, has yielded entity-type results for quite a while now, but this new implementation provides much more detailed info than before.

As always aim to build quality links

“I think it'll be a long time before Google is in a position to marginalise its link graph, and that building quality links in the traditional sense will be a significant part of any SEO strategy for the foreseeable future. “

Yet another ball to juggle

Tim suspects that, just as Google must have plans to extend the reach of social media to its traditional ranking metrics, it’ll look to do something similar with entities and the Knowledge Graph.

“There are more visual cues these days as to Google and Bing’s intentions, but that’s a double-edged sword. Previously, SEOs had to monitor keywords and sites on the SERPs to keep tabs on algorithm changes. Now it’s just as important to monitor Google’s presentation of results across the different verticals,” says Tim.

SEO could become even more of a PR and content game than it already is

Tim also suggested that Google was exploring options and that he wouldn't be surprised to see their algorithm give substantial weighting to the following sooner or later: 

  • Citations or articles by reputable authors and publications (linked and unlinked)
  • Mentions in relation to prominent entities or people (for example, a celebrity  mentioned in connection to your brand or site)
  • Search activity and trends
  • Social Media discussion (not just shares, Likes or tweets, but actual volume of discussion)

“Of course, there's an additional layer to this story, and that's one to do with ethics and the damage Google's doing to site owners by pushing greater volumes of "knowledge" out into the SERPs,” said Tim.

By pushing more data onto the search engine results pages, there is less and less need for users to visit websites, meaning less likelihood of conversions. Brands will need to further incentivise consumers to visit their online spaces. But that is a discussion for another day.

About The Author

Comments

From an SEO POV I wonder how this will affect CTR on entities such as Wikipedia, and if that will have a knock-on effect in rankings and in what's presented. One would guess that a) the algorithm would account for this, and b) that Google is in reality drawing from a few fixed sites / feeds.

However, I think the larger implications are probably for Paid Search campaigns that are targeting these 'entities'. Two things are going to happen here:

1) Ads on the right-hand side are going to be pushed further down.
2) Users' eyes are going to start getting more attracted to the right.

From the above, does that mean that appearing above the Organic results is going to be more critical than ever? Or does it mean that Google wants to get more eyeballs onto PPC ads in general, meaning that the right column is the place to be? Does this mean that the top should be reserved for media ads and sitelinks, whilst the right is where the traditional / standard ads should go?

Regardless, when this rolls out it's going to have a large impact on Quality Score for better or worse.

Posted by Carlos on 2012/05/29

@Carlos - Good point. I believe that (currently) the knowledge graph only comes into play for highly uncommercial search terms - examples cited by Google on their blog post announcing the KG http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html are far from commercial search terms:

[taj mahal]
[matt groening]

Would the knowledge graph "enhanced SERP layout" be triggered for searches like:

[hotels near taj mahal]
[buy simpson dvd boxset]

I think not.

Google would be crazy to push their paid ads way down below the fold in favour of historical/useful/quirky facts about the entity mentioned in commercial search terms.

I merely think of this as Google's way of usurping (uSERPing?) result pages that wiki-type sites used to dominate with ease.

Pretty much the same thing they've done with flights - http://www.discoverafricagroup.com/blog/google-flight-search-launched/

World domination Google +1.

Sidenote: @Keryn - is this article title supposed to read "entries in search" or "entities in search"? Just saying - Andre

Posted by Andre Van Kets on 2012/06/14

@Andre at the moment that's definitely the case (and data is taken from a small sample), but I expect major brands will be next in line to receive the knowledge graph/entities treatment for certain search phrases, e.g. Samsung, Sony, BMW (Google already displays related people for the latter).

They may not choose to roll it out across all niches, but Google now has the capability to form an entity from a group of pages that discuss a company or product. In theory, they could aggregate data about a Nikon D90 camera, for example, and choose to display that in the knowledge graph frame. It all depends on whether they deem this presentation to be favourable in terms of usability as well as achieving their own ends.

Posted by Tim Withers on 2012/06/15

@Andre Indeed. It was intended to be "Entities in Search". I think this got muddled up somewhere along the way. Thanks! I'll get right on fixing that. Well spotted.

Posted by Keryn on 2012/06/15

@Tim - Yes. Not long before we have a Google Shopping + Knowledge Graph + Adwords mashup.

Posted by Andre Van Kets on 2012/06/15

Make a comment

To prevent GottaQuirk from becoming spam central, we block the use of certain words like porn, sex etc. We apologise for any inconvenience, but can't spend our lives deleting messages left by spammy friends.

Captcha
 

The Latest News

Subscribe to our fortnightly newsletter which is packed with interesting news, views and other quirky titbits.

Subscribe

RSS

RSS to Email

Get our latest blog posts delivered straight to your inbox.

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

What's on offer?