There's an interesting discussion going on at vitamin at the moment; the author of the article “Why standards still matter”, Roger Johannson, comments on how few web designers and developers use web standards when building sites - i.e. they are not separating the structure (the HTML or XHTML) from the presentation (Cascading Style Sheets).
The Web Standards Project was formed in 1998 but the message of just how vital web standards are seems to have been lost. This push for standards has also not got off the ground in South Africa as mentioned in a previous post.
So why do we need these standards anyway, it's just extra work and tables do the job, don't they?
Web standards can do the following for your site:
if you are testing up until ie 5 then you shouldnt encounter any major problems. I use the tried and tested css techniques eg the box model hack, nothing fancy. in my short experience using css for layout i have found firefox, safari and ie (not beyond 5) to handle this pretty well.
Posted by gavin on 2006/10/10
Well, I've used css layout on a recent site and was fine in IE 6 but broke in IE 7...*sigh*!
Posted by Roger Saner on 2006/10/12
Get our latest blog posts delivered straight to your inbox.
Subscribe to our fortnightly newsletter which is packed with interesting eMarketing news, views and other quirky titbits.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |

Name:
Friends of Quirk
Websites:
www.quirk.biz
I also abhor tables and am (slowly) migrating to css but am finding positioning a tough thing to get my head around. At least with tables - although ugly - my site isn't going to break in some browser which doesn't implement css properly. Any advice?
Posted by Roger Saner on 2006/10/09