After removing CAPTCHAS from our software and replacing it with the method discussed in An alternative to irritating CAPTCHAs about 3 months ago, I went through our server log files to see how successful the method has been.
Luckily I made a log entry every time the software rejected a submission based on the belief that it came from a spambot, so it was relatively easy to obtain the following stats.
For the period 01-01-2007 to 23-02-2007 there has been approximately 7345 spam submissions that have been blocked by the software. That comes to an average of 136 spam submissions a day.
But the real question is how many time has it let spam through?
Well in the beginning there was the odd case here and there where a spambot came through but that was normally due to them having a cached version of the form and a simple change of the form's action resolved that problem. So all in all it has proven to be a successful weapon in the fight against spambots.
If, or should I rather say, when the time comes that the bots get past this form of prevention then there are always further steps that can be taken as I found out in an article by Ned Batchelder.
But until that day comes I'll sit back and enjoy our CAPTCHA-less forms and have a bit of a chuckle every time I see an entry in the server log saying "Form submission failed due to possible spam activity."
Jean, think I just saw a dodgy comment under the Search Engine Scoop article from Webmaster.
Posted by Smallz on 2007/03/01
Get our latest blog posts delivered straight to your inbox.
Subscribe to our fortnightly newsletter which is packed with interesting eMarketing news, views and other quirky titbits.
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||

Name:
Friends of Quirk
Websites:
www.quirk.biz
LEKKERBRU
Posted by Smith on 2007/02/28